Uncategorized

Rural Poverty in 54 Africa and other Developing Countries in the World

Rural poverty

Rural Poverty in 54 Africa and other Developing Countries in the World. In the development literature rural poverty has continued to be seen as synonymous to Africa. Extreme poverty continues to be overwhelmingly rural: an estimated 79 per cent of those experiencing poverty live in rural areas. With latest figures indicating that in 2015 there were around 736 million people living in extreme poverty globally – down from nearly 2 billion in 1990 – it can be surmised that the number of poor rural people in the world today in likely in the realm of 580 million.

 

Taking into account multiple-dimensional aspects of deprivation – including, for example, access to education and essential services – the rurality of poverty becomes even more stark: an estimated 83.5 per cent of poverty is rural taking this approach. Much of this poverty is concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, home to approximately 413 million poor people, where the poverty rate – at 41 per cent – is notably higher than all other regions of the world, where it is below 13 per cent; globally 10 per cent of the world’s population lives in extreme poverty, down from 36 per cent in 1990.

 

Notably, Africa remains the world’s most rural region, with still 60 per cent of the population living in rural areas as of 2014, though with urbanization proceeding rapidly this figure is projected to decline to 44 per cent by 2050.

 

In Asia, with structural transformation more advanced and many rural people having benefitted from the Green Revolution, the question is more of addressing pockets of poverty, where rural some people – especially those operating on remote and marginal farmlands not connected to urban markets – have been left behind in the economic transformation of previous decades. Similarly, in Latin America pockets of rural poverty remain though societies have largely urbanized.

Rural
Rural

Indicators

In general, there are strong indications that, under prevailing political economy frameworks in most developing countries, living in a rural area increases a person’s probability of suffering from poverty and deprivation. This is supported by the reality that the global poverty rate in rural areas (17.2 per cent) is more than three times as high as that in urban areas (5.3 per cent). Issues of political participation link with and influence factors such as under-investment in rural infrastructure and service provision serve to reinforce rural-urban inequalities and suggest the persistence of what Lipton referred to decades ago as the “urban bias in development”.

Rural Stakeholders

Consequently, Key stakeholders in rural communities, including rural women, rural youth, smallholder farmers, indigenous peoples and rural landless workers, are among those most likely to be left behind. Not surprisingly, the lack of progress in rural areas – and prevailing rural-urban disparities – has been cited as one of the reasons aggregate progress was held back in the Millennium Development Goal era. It is especially alarming that the prospects of children and youth in rural areas are often held back compared with children in urban areas: they are more likely to be out of school and to be involved in child labour, most of which is concentrated in agriculture.

The most pronounced inequalities occur when rurality intersects with other forms of marginalization, resulting from variables such as gender, ethnicity and age. For example, in most countries, while rural youth have lower literacy rates than urban youth, for rural female youth the situation is even more stark, with less than half having basic literacy skills, impeding employment and entrepreneurship prospects.

Drivers of rural poverty

The drivers of rural poverty may be broken into three dimensions: economic, social and environmental. From the economic side, low levels of productivity, lack of diversification of rural economies and access to markets to a large extent emanate diseconomies of scale associated with providing rural infrastructure and services. From a social perspective, patterns of exclusion in rural communities may undermine cohesion in some contexts and mean that certain groups may face addition challenges in enhancing livelihoods. For example, the constraints facing rural women are exacerbated by gender-based power imbalance and lack of gender awareness in policy implementation, leading to persistent gender gaps related to outcomes such as land ownership, productivity, and rural wages.

Environment

With respect to the environment, biodiversity loss and environmental degradation particularly impact rural people who generally rely heavily upon natural resources for their livelihood sources, most commonly through agriculture. And there is increasing awareness that the already severe effects of climate change are serving to exacerbate challenges facing poor rural people. These challenges represent significant impediments to the achievement of the ambitions of the 2030 Agenda, not least the commitment to leave no-one behind

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button